Re: Computer GUID
From: Ron Ruble (raffles2@att.net)
Date: 11/26/02
- Next message: Walter Roberson: "Re: Parameter Overflow Attack?"
- Previous message: jardinero: "Re: canaries in live code"
- In reply to: Barry Margolin: "Re: Computer GUID"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Ron Ruble" <raffles2@att.net> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:32:06 -0500
"Barry Margolin" <barmar@genuity.net> wrote in message
news:L7NE9.16$fP2.184@paloalto-snr1.gtei.net...
> If you had them on different segments of the same LAN, the switch that
> connects the segments would not be able to handle it properly. It
will
> only map the MAC address to a single port at a time, so packets will
> frequently be sent to the wrong segment.
>
> Perhaps what you meant to say is that you can have them on different
> subnets, but not the same subnet (but if the two subnets are VLANs
> connected to the same switch fabric, you may still have problems).
Thank you for the correction.
- Next message: Walter Roberson: "Re: Parameter Overflow Attack?"
- Previous message: jardinero: "Re: canaries in live code"
- In reply to: Barry Margolin: "Re: Computer GUID"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|