Re: Random Numbers
From: Bill Unruh (unruh@string.physics.ubc.ca)Date: 11/08/02
- Next message: dazedandconfused: "Re: AOL as ISP - need data to pursue threatening e-mail"
- Previous message: Mark Gordon: "Re: security clearance question for those that have it"
- In reply to: Jem Berkes: "Re: Random Numbers"
- Next in thread: : "Re: Random Numbers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: unruh@string.physics.ubc.ca (Bill Unruh) Date: 8 Nov 2002 17:42:21 GMT
Jem Berkes <jb2002-delete-this-AND-users@users.pc9.org> writes:
]> The thermal noise of a (hot) resistor or a zenor diode with current
]> flowing through.
]> To get the numbers out of the noise you need an A/D converter - and
]> here we go with determinism. Missing bits, effective resolution a.s.o.
]> For most app's this will work, though.
]Thermal noise is pretty good for randomness. I've heard the best way is to
]take a reverse biased zener diode and observe the fluctuations of current
]through the device. The zener breaks down and conducts in the reverse
]direction due to a quantum mechanical tunneling effect. Find any
]correlation in that, and physicists will love you for years to come :)
It is very very easy to put correlations into that. Just hook up a
capacitor across the zener, and there you have correlations in the
noise. Most physical systems have correlations over time introduced by
all sorts of dynamics. That the underlying fundamental process may not
is irrelevant, since you only see the fundamental process through a maze
of other connections, which have things like stray capacitances,
inductances, etc. Or A/D converters which like to put out even number
rather than odd. Almost all physical process have 1/f noise, which is
correlated (that is what 1/f means-- a spectrum which is not flat over
long time scales-- Ie, long term correlations).
]--
]Jem Berkes
]http://www.pc-tools.net/
]Windows, Linux & UNIX software
- Next message: dazedandconfused: "Re: AOL as ISP - need data to pursue threatening e-mail"
- Previous message: Mark Gordon: "Re: security clearance question for those that have it"
- In reply to: Jem Berkes: "Re: Random Numbers"
- Next in thread: : "Re: Random Numbers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|