Re: nbsession vs ftp
From: Alun Jones (alun@texis.com)Date: 08/22/02
- Next message: Alun Jones: "Re: nt service packs and hotfixes"
- Previous message: Alun Jones: "Re: data recovery"
- In reply to: phn@icke-reklam.ipsec.nu: "Re: nbsession vs ftp"
- Next in thread: HC: "Re: nbsession vs ftp"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: alun@texis.com (Alun Jones) Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 00:42:50 GMT
In article <ak0jbr$l7k$3@nyheter.crt.se>, phn@icke-reklam.ipsec.nu wrote:
>manny <mannyr@prontomail.com> wrote:
>> We have Windows NT servers in the DMZ that our internal NT servers map
>> a drive to to copy files. Internal servers -> DMZ servers. Our
>> Firewall administrator closed the door to nbsession which allows our
>> internal server to map a drive on the DMZ server. I told the admin
>> that he should allow nbsession from internal to DMZ and disallow from
>> DMZ to internal. He told me to use FTP.
>
>> On a security viewpoint, is FTP better than nbsession?
>
>Yes. Each session is authenticated. An nbsession might carry
>other traffic in either direction while open.
And, when the FTP client and server are configured to encrypt, and require
encryption, respectively, there's even more security involved.
Alun.
~~~~
[Please don't email posters, if a Usenet response is appropriate.]
-- Texas Imperial Software | Try WFTPD, the Windows FTP Server. Find us at 1602 Harvest Moon Place | http://www.wftpd.com or email alun@texis.com Cedar Park TX 78613-1419 | VISA/MC accepted. NT-based sites, be sure to Fax/Voice +1(512)258-9858 | read details of WFTPD Pro for XP/2000/NT.
- Next message: Alun Jones: "Re: nt service packs and hotfixes"
- Previous message: Alun Jones: "Re: data recovery"
- In reply to: phn@icke-reklam.ipsec.nu: "Re: nbsession vs ftp"
- Next in thread: HC: "Re: nbsession vs ftp"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|