Re: P2P software is security?
From: Kendal Emery (kemery@coordinatedhomecare.com)Date: 07/05/02
- Next message: Kendal Emery: "Re: insider threat"
- Previous message: : "Re: lpd across the Internet - how secure?"
- In reply to: Richard Steven Hack: "Re: P2P software is security?"
- Next in thread: Richard Steven Hack: "Re: P2P software is security?"
- Reply: Richard Steven Hack: "Re: P2P software is security?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Kendal Emery" <kemery@coordinatedhomecare.com> Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 10:49:46 -0600
"Richard Steven Hack" <richardhack@SPAMHELLNOznet.com> wrote in message
news:3d23af38.155773066@localhost...
>
> >If you're considering Linux, then this is just as insecure as MS products
> >straight out-of-the box,
>
> Wrong. While UNIX/Linux have their vulnerabilities, they don't have
> the same ones Windows products have - and there are FAR more exploits
> for Windows products than UNIX/Linux.
>
>
there is actually a reason behind this, that makes sense.
There are a whole lot more people using windows than linux/unix. And of
those people, there are a far greater majority of them that don't know much
about computers, let alone their operating system. So if you want to
exploit a greter number of people with your program, you create it for
windows. That way, you have a better chance of hitting more people.
Just my two cents.....
Kendal
- Next message: Kendal Emery: "Re: insider threat"
- Previous message: : "Re: lpd across the Internet - how secure?"
- In reply to: Richard Steven Hack: "Re: P2P software is security?"
- Next in thread: Richard Steven Hack: "Re: P2P software is security?"
- Reply: Richard Steven Hack: "Re: P2P software is security?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]