Re: Source code security - rogue developers?
From: Mark Biggar (mark.a.biggar@attbi.com)Date: 06/14/02
- Next message: Richard Atkinson: "Re: Our Data : an appeal - a "Plimsoll line" for computer security"
- Previous message: michael: "Re: Source code security - rogue developers?"
- In reply to: Walter Roberson: "Re: Source code security - rogue developers?"
- Next in thread: : "Re: Source code security - rogue developers?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Mark Biggar <mark.a.biggar@attbi.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 05:00:58 GMT
Walter Roberson wrote:
>
> In article <aebdts$j7t$2@sapa.inka.de>,
> Bernd Eckenfels <ecki-news2002-06@lina.inka.de> wrote:
> :It is not that easy to prevent someone from plugging into a socket or
> :unplugging the net from a workstation.
>
> It's not hard for the common cases. Use a switch, set MAC-level
> security for the unused ports, isolate down to specific MACs for
> used ports, and have the switch set to send SNMP traps when the
> port link goes up or down.
Can that distinguish between a disconnect and a computer power down?
If not I just pull the plug on the back of my PC plug in my laptop
with a crossover cable and download anything I want.
-- Mark Biggar mark.a.biggar@attbi.com
- Next message: Richard Atkinson: "Re: Our Data : an appeal - a "Plimsoll line" for computer security"
- Previous message: michael: "Re: Source code security - rogue developers?"
- In reply to: Walter Roberson: "Re: Source code security - rogue developers?"
- Next in thread: : "Re: Source code security - rogue developers?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
