Re: SSH vs. Dialup security
From: Lassi Hippeläinen (lahippel@ieee.orgies.invalid)Date: 05/19/02
- Next message: James Jardine: "Re: Logging on to LAN"
- Previous message: Anne & Lynn Wheeler: "Re: Is it safe to use social securty number as intranet username? (long)"
- In reply to: Barry Margolin: "Re: SSH vs. Dialup security"
- Next in thread: Dave Pimlott: "Re: SSH vs. Dialup security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Lassi Hippeläinen <lahippel@ieee.orgies.invalid> Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 15:55:21 GMT
Barry Margolin wrote:
<...>
> You don't need DSL, cable modems, or static IPs for a VPN; all you need is
> some kind of ISP connection.
...and a personal firewall in every laptop of a road warrior, and some
way to manage their rule bases. With dial-up you connect directly to the
corporate intranet, which is protected by a local firewall.
Well... there could be a MITM attack, if the enemy gets access to the
phone lines between you and the home...
-- Lassi
- Next message: James Jardine: "Re: Logging on to LAN"
- Previous message: Anne & Lynn Wheeler: "Re: Is it safe to use social securty number as intranet username? (long)"
- In reply to: Barry Margolin: "Re: SSH vs. Dialup security"
- Next in thread: Dave Pimlott: "Re: SSH vs. Dialup security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading