Re: Website Hacking Attempt - letting the IP Block owners know?
From: those who know me have no need of my name (not-a-real-address@usa.net)Date: 06/23/02
- Next message: Ross Williams: "The Tao Of Backup!"
- Previous message: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: [Symantec NIS] They did it again: Support issues"
- In reply to: Don Grover: "Re: Website Hacking Attempt - letting the IP Block owners know?"
- Next in thread: HC: "Re: Website Hacking Attempt - letting the IP Block owners know?"
- Next in thread: HC: "Re: Website Hacking Attempt - letting the IP Block owners know?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: those who know me have no need of my name <not-a-real-address@usa.net> Date: 23 Jun 2002 13:16:00 GMT
in comp.security.misc i read:
>Just of interest, XX out your IP still leaves your IP in news msg exposed
>Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
>Message-ID: <Xns9235E0520966Epaulhutchingsgmxnet@216.168.3.XX>
>References: <Xns9235CF90DEA7Dpaulhutchingsgmxnet@216.168.3.XX>
it's the ip address of supernews' server cluster, not paul's system.
-- bringing you boring signatures for 17 years
- Next message: Ross Williams: "The Tao Of Backup!"
- Previous message: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: [Symantec NIS] They did it again: Support issues"
- In reply to: Don Grover: "Re: Website Hacking Attempt - letting the IP Block owners know?"
- Next in thread: HC: "Re: Website Hacking Attempt - letting the IP Block owners know?"
- Next in thread: HC: "Re: Website Hacking Attempt - letting the IP Block owners know?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]