Re: Did anyone tried using CryptoHeaven instead of PGP?
From: Mark (spamnada@thistime.net)Date: 06/18/02
- Next message: David J. Aronson: "Re: Source code security - rogue developers?"
- Previous message: Alun Jones: "Re: FTP vs. encryption"
- In reply to: Aneta Daas: "Did anyone tried using CryptoHeaven instead of PGP?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Mark" <spamnada@thistime.net> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 15:42:11 -0700
Try this:
"Aneta Daas" <aneta737@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:80685d2ecc8f395b2ea38b252c199c5e.98439@mygate.mailgate.org...
> My friend is using CryptoHeaven to securely communicate with his team.
> He said CryptoHeaven uses high encryption and offers more functionality
> than PGP. I installed the software... it has a nice user interface.
> You can send email, chat and share files... but I don't know much about
> encryption...so does anyone know if the software is really secure as it
> claims?
>
>
> --
> Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
- Next message: David J. Aronson: "Re: Source code security - rogue developers?"
- Previous message: Alun Jones: "Re: FTP vs. encryption"
- In reply to: Aneta Daas: "Did anyone tried using CryptoHeaven instead of PGP?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
