Cisco WLAN bridge: to VPN or not to VPN..that is the question
From: blah (blah@blah.com)Date: 04/30/02
- Next message: Michael Erskine: "Re: Testing for Trojans and Backdoors FAQ"
- Previous message: Doctor Arcane: "Case studies on full disclosure vs. "security through obscurity""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: blah@blah.com (blah) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 23:25:52 GMT
Without going into all the gory details.....
I can do a Cisco Bridge 350 using Cisco LEAP to authenticate the
non-root bridge as a LEAP client. Then I get all the 802.1x stuff as
well as the cisco security tweaks while using a Steel Belted Radius
Server for authentication (of non-root bridge).
or I can setup a pair of Nokia Crypto-clusters and run triple-des over
the link and leave the physical side of things fairly open.
obviously the vpn solution adds cost, complexity, support issues,
etc., but would 802.1x leap be secure enough for the next 12 months or
so??
any opinions welcome..
- Next message: Michael Erskine: "Re: Testing for Trojans and Backdoors FAQ"
- Previous message: Doctor Arcane: "Case studies on full disclosure vs. "security through obscurity""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|