Re: PKI and Relying Parties
From: Paul Rubin (phr-n2002a@nightsong.com)Date: 03/27/02
- Next message: phn@icke-reklam.ipsec.nu: "Re: Secure tunneling via HTTP?"
- Previous message: Anne & Lynn Wheeler: "Re: PKI and Relying Parties"
- In reply to: Anne & Lynn Wheeler: "Re: PKI and Relying Parties"
- Next in thread: lyal collins: "Re: PKI and Relying Parties"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Paul Rubin <phr-n2002a@nightsong.com> Date: 27 Mar 2002 10:35:52 -0800
Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> writes:
> some number of financial institutions have gone to "relying party
> only" certificates ... i.e. certificates issued by the institution and
> only useful by that insitution. what they found out was that they were
> interested in public key authentication ... which (apparently when
> they started) they thought was equivalent to PKI, CAs, certificates,
> etc.
>
> What they started to find out was that the transactions & operations
> were accessing the same infrastructure that effectively was used for
> issuing the certificates ... including real time status information.
>
> It was then trivially possible to show that the actual issuance of a
> certificate as redundant and superfulous.
Yeah, that's what the whole private CA biz seems to be about (Verisign
OnSite, etc.)
- Next message: phn@icke-reklam.ipsec.nu: "Re: Secure tunneling via HTTP?"
- Previous message: Anne & Lynn Wheeler: "Re: PKI and Relying Parties"
- In reply to: Anne & Lynn Wheeler: "Re: PKI and Relying Parties"
- Next in thread: lyal collins: "Re: PKI and Relying Parties"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|