PKI and Relying Parties
From: Harold Hammond (HammondITS@netscape.net)Date: 03/27/02
- Next message: chris@nospam.com: "Re: How to make Windows require two passwords for the Administrator?"
- Previous message: Splatter: "Re: PING splatter [was: Re: Can a hacker]"
- Next in thread: Paul Rubin: "Re: PKI and Relying Parties"
- Reply: Paul Rubin: "Re: PKI and Relying Parties"
- Reply: lyal collins: "Re: PKI and Relying Parties"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Harold Hammond <HammondITS@netscape.net> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 09:59:05 -0500
I have a pretty good understand of PKI, however, I'm not sure what would
be the solution for an enterprise that wishes to be a relying party but
not a CA. We don't want to be issuing certs. Right now, we don't want
anyone else to be issuing certs on our behalf. We just want to be able
to validate certificates. If its a level 3 cert and its from an
approved CA (or a subondinate of an approved CA) then we can be certain
of the user's identity and will let then attempt to access our system.
TIA
-Harold
- Next message: chris@nospam.com: "Re: How to make Windows require two passwords for the Administrator?"
- Previous message: Splatter: "Re: PING splatter [was: Re: Can a hacker]"
- Next in thread: Paul Rubin: "Re: PKI and Relying Parties"
- Reply: Paul Rubin: "Re: PKI and Relying Parties"
- Reply: lyal collins: "Re: PKI and Relying Parties"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
