Re: How do they blank out IP addresses etc?
From: John Perry (JohnPerry@redoak.co.ukNOSPAM)Date: 01/28/02
- Previous message: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: Defeating the supercookie"
- In reply to: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: How do they blank out IP addresses etc?"
- Next in thread: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: How do they blank out IP addresses etc?"
- Reply: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: How do they blank out IP addresses etc?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: John Perry <JohnPerry@redoak.co.ukNOSPAM> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 21:16:27 +0000
those who know me have no need of my name <not-a-real-address@usa.net>
wrote:
><va7b5ukf6pboqkgm91fksd1th4vc04nlqm@4ax.com> divulged:
>
>>They were the real headers.
>
>it's not that they aren't real, it's that they aren't _complete_. there
>should be at least one received header in every message.
OK, my wrong choice of words. Those were the complete headers I
received - what the guy has done is munged up the X-Originating-IP so
that no IP address appears. In all three cases, I took the headers from
Outlook Express using Message Properties, Details, Message Source
-- JohnPerry@redoak.co.ukNOSPAM (delete NOSPAM) www.redoak.co.uk www.eze-buy.co.uk
- Next message: bb: "Re: Defeating the supercookie"
- Previous message: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: Defeating the supercookie"
- In reply to: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: How do they blank out IP addresses etc?"
- Next in thread: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: How do they blank out IP addresses etc?"
- Reply: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: How do they blank out IP addresses etc?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|