Re: How do they blank out IP addresses etc?
From: those who know me have no need of my name (not-a-real-address@usa.net)Date: 01/28/02
- Next message: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: Defeating the supercookie"
- Previous message: phn@icke-reklam.ipsec.nu: "Re: Your choice, CISCO, ENTERASYS or ISS IDS?"
- In reply to: John Perry: "Re: How do they blank out IP addresses etc?"
- Next in thread: John Perry: "Re: How do they blank out IP addresses etc?"
- Reply: John Perry: "Re: How do they blank out IP addresses etc?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: those who know me have no need of my name <not-a-real-address@usa.net> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 21:03:23 -0000
<va7b5ukf6pboqkgm91fksd1th4vc04nlqm@4ax.com> divulged:
>They were the real headers.
it's not that they aren't real, it's that they aren't _complete_. there
should be at least one received header in every message.
-- okay, have a sig then
- Next message: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: Defeating the supercookie"
- Previous message: phn@icke-reklam.ipsec.nu: "Re: Your choice, CISCO, ENTERASYS or ISS IDS?"
- In reply to: John Perry: "Re: How do they blank out IP addresses etc?"
- Next in thread: John Perry: "Re: How do they blank out IP addresses etc?"
- Reply: John Perry: "Re: How do they blank out IP addresses etc?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]