Re: what if the message-ID generator generates a dirty word?
From: Jacques L'helgoualc'h (lhh@free.fr)Date: 01/21/02
- Next message: Rich Seifert: "Re: Which switches are/aren't prone to MAC flooding attacks?"
- Previous message: Karl Kleinpaste: "Re: what if the message-ID generator generates a dirty word?"
- In reply to: Barry Margolin: "Re: what if the message-ID generator generates a dirty word?"
- Next in thread: Walter Roberson: "Re: what if the message-ID generator generates a dirty word?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Jacques L'helgoualc'h <lhh@free.fr> Date: 21 Jan 2002 23:13:02 +0100
Barry Margolin <barmar@genuity.net> a dit :
[...]
> How about all-numeric (or mostly-numeric, except for username and date
> sections) message ID's?
69 & 666 :)
-- Jacques L'helgoualc'h
- Next message: Rich Seifert: "Re: Which switches are/aren't prone to MAC flooding attacks?"
- Previous message: Karl Kleinpaste: "Re: what if the message-ID generator generates a dirty word?"
- In reply to: Barry Margolin: "Re: what if the message-ID generator generates a dirty word?"
- Next in thread: Walter Roberson: "Re: what if the message-ID generator generates a dirty word?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
