Re: fedwu.windowsupdate.com "Fed WU" ?
From: Dimitri Maziuk (dima@127.0.0.1)Date: 12/22/01
- Previous message: kmskie@hotmail.com: "100% FREE SEX PICTURE GALLERIES 2199"
- In reply to: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: fedwu.windowsupdate.com "Fed WU" ?"
- Next in thread: Doc.Cypher: "Re: fedwu.windowsupdate.com "Fed WU" ?"
- Next in thread: derek: "Re: fedwu.windowsupdate.com "Fed WU" ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Dimitri Maziuk <dima@127.0.0.1> Date: 22 Dec 2001 19:09:04 GMT
On 22 Dec 2001 03:34:59 GMT, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In comp.security.misc Alun Jones <alun@texis.com> wrote:
>> Maybe I'm thick, or something, but "I don't get it".
>
>> Why is this any more a poor choice than "server01"?
>
> Ppl think it is a redirect to an FBI site where they can update your OS with
> their virus/snooping software. Fed=Federal.
Next they'll stop going to our website "'cause server names sound
fishy", and TPTB will call me on Xmas: "come and fix the servers!
We aren't getting any hits! Something's wrong with the network!"
(Our hostnames are tuna, urchin, medusa etc.)
Dima (d'oh!)
-- We're sysadmins. Sanity happens to other people. -- Chris King
- Next message: K.J. Seefried: "Re: fedwu.windowsupdate.com "Fed WU" ?"
- Previous message: kmskie@hotmail.com: "100% FREE SEX PICTURE GALLERIES 2199"
- In reply to: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: fedwu.windowsupdate.com "Fed WU" ?"
- Next in thread: Doc.Cypher: "Re: fedwu.windowsupdate.com "Fed WU" ?"
- Next in thread: derek: "Re: fedwu.windowsupdate.com "Fed WU" ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|