Re: fedwu.windowsupdate.com "Fed WU" ?
From: Bernd Eckenfels (usenet2001-12@lina.inka.de)Date: 12/22/01
- Next message: Martin Bishop: "Re: comparison of security of different operating system architectures"
- Previous message: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: fedwu.windowsupdate.com "Fed WU" ?"
- In reply to: Colonel Sam Flagg, U.S. Army Intelligence (ret): "Re: fedwu.windowsupdate.com "Fed WU" ?"
- Next in thread: Colonel Sam Flagg, U.S. Army Intelligence (ret): "Re: fedwu.windowsupdate.com "Fed WU" ?"
- Next in thread: Ralph Jones: "Re: fedwu.windowsupdate.com "Fed WU" ?"
- Reply: Colonel Sam Flagg, U.S. Army Intelligence (ret): "Re: fedwu.windowsupdate.com "Fed WU" ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Bernd Eckenfels <usenet2001-12@lina.inka.de> Date: 22 Dec 2001 03:36:11 GMT
In comp.security.misc "Colonel Sam Flagg, U.S. Army Intelligence (ret)" <colonel_flagg@nosoupforj00thepentagon.com> wrote:
> didn't go much further than that... running Win2k, I didnt have any
> updates worth getting and frankly, I bet the only thing running on
> fedwu is the new XP download...
There are quite a lot of critival updates for win2k already.
Greetings
Bernd
- Next message: Martin Bishop: "Re: comparison of security of different operating system architectures"
- Previous message: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: fedwu.windowsupdate.com "Fed WU" ?"
- In reply to: Colonel Sam Flagg, U.S. Army Intelligence (ret): "Re: fedwu.windowsupdate.com "Fed WU" ?"
- Next in thread: Colonel Sam Flagg, U.S. Army Intelligence (ret): "Re: fedwu.windowsupdate.com "Fed WU" ?"
- Next in thread: Ralph Jones: "Re: fedwu.windowsupdate.com "Fed WU" ?"
- Reply: Colonel Sam Flagg, U.S. Army Intelligence (ret): "Re: fedwu.windowsupdate.com "Fed WU" ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]