Re: Do not use Port 24032 for P2P
- From: Chris Davies <chris-usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:00:59 +0100
Am Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:56:59 -0700 schrieb Chilly8:
Of course, a good encryption system can defeat traffic analysis.
Burkhard Ott <news@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
yep, thats what the smart people do :-).
Um, let me see now. Consider a PC making lots of TCP sessions to "random"
places. There are a lot of other "random" places making TCP connections
to this PC. The whole lot either self-limits to a relatively arbitrary
KB/s or else tries to fill up the entire available bandwidth. Encryption
or not, I'd suggest that this scenario was remarkably consistent with
a P2P model, regardless of the traffic content.
Traffic analysis is (partly) about looking for recognisable patterns.
Chris
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Do not use Port 24032 for P2P
- From: Chilly8
- Re: Do not use Port 24032 for P2P
- From: Gary
- Re: Do not use Port 24032 for P2P
- References:
- Do not use Port 24032 for P2P
- From: reticulans
- Re: Do not use Port 24032 for P2P
- From: Chris Davies
- Re: Do not use Port 24032 for P2P
- From: Chilly8
- Re: Do not use Port 24032 for P2P
- From: Burkhard Ott
- Do not use Port 24032 for P2P
- Prev by Date: Re: Do not use Port 24032 for P2P
- Next by Date: Re: Router security issue
- Previous by thread: Re: Do not use Port 24032 for P2P
- Next by thread: Re: Do not use Port 24032 for P2P
- Index(es):