Re: Microsoft Firewall vs ????
- From: Volker Birk <bumens@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Mar 2008 03:50:20 +0100
Rat River Cemetary <dead@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Volker Birk wrote:
for my part: first I wrote http://www.dingens.org/breakout.c (for IE6)Man on the inside says this.
and http://www.dingens.org/breakout-mozilla-firefox.c (for Firefox 1.x).
After that, at least Zone Alarm and Comodo tinkered again. Then I wrote
breakout-wp.cpp - and they lost again.
This topic is somewhat boring now.
"Neither the batch commands, nor the .c programs are remote exploits of
a firewall.
What "batch files"? Is this text about something else?
What you asked about is Vista, and these are not Vista exploits."
I did not talk about Vista, but about "Personal Firewalls".
And I'm not talking about remote exploits or exploits at all.
Yours,
VB.
--
The file name of an indirect node file is the string "iNode" immediately
followed by the link reference converted to decimal text, with no leading
zeroes. For example, an indirect node file with link reference 123 would
have the name "iNode123". - HFS Plus Volume Format, MacOS X
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Microsoft Firewall vs ????
- From: Rat River Cemetary
- Re: Microsoft Firewall vs ????
- References:
- Re: Microsoft Firewall vs ????
- From: Victek
- Re: Microsoft Firewall vs ????
- From: Sebastian G.
- Re: Microsoft Firewall vs ????
- From: Rat River Cemetary
- Re: Microsoft Firewall vs ????
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Microsoft Firewall vs ????
- From: Rat River Cemetary
- Re: Microsoft Firewall vs ????
- Prev by Date: Re: Microsoft Firewall vs ????
- Next by Date: Re: Microsoft Firewall vs ????
- Previous by thread: Re: Microsoft Firewall vs ????
- Next by thread: Re: Microsoft Firewall vs ????
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|