Re: 6 meg DSL with Watchguard x500

From: Tsudohnimh <tsudohnimh@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:55:54 -0000

On Oct 27, 11:29 pm, "news.comcast.net" <i...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

All I needed to hear was "watchguard" and I knew what the problem was. Those
boxes are garbage.

I've got to voice my support for WG products. Their edges and fireware
E series core firewall are top notch. The proxies through the older
software (WFS) did give quite a performance hit but the new fireware
is a power house. Their support is great, the application layer
proxies are great and dare anyone to show me a better logging and
reporting service than WG.

Tsudohnimh
KnowtheNetwork.com

.

References:
- 6 meg DSL with Watchguard x500
  - From: natehewett
- Re: 6 meg DSL with Watchguard x500
  - From: news.comcast.net

Prev by Date: Re: Jetico Personal Firewall freeware asks way to many questions
Next by Date: Re: ATTN: Leythos - Hardware Firewall Solution
Previous by thread: Re: 6 meg DSL with Watchguard x500
Next by thread: Anything wrong with blocking "new" SYN/ACK packets?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: marshall proxy interface pointer
... marshaling of proxies. ... Does it mean in current Windows ... Current versions of Windows support GIT, ...
(microsoft.public.vc.language)
marshall proxy interface pointer
... one down side to this feature is that it does not support the ... marshaling of proxies. ... To cater to this specific requirement, Windows NT 4.0 Service Pack 3 ...
(microsoft.public.vc.language)
Re: How can i acquire information about the hardware firewall
... I dont think there is a standar way of doing this, ... You may add support for proxies (socks5, etc) a lot of apps do this. ...
(microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)