Re: How did they get past my NAT?
- From: Volker Birk <bumens@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Oct 2007 07:15:05 +0200
jameshanley39@xxxxxxxxxxx <jameshanley39@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
NAT Blocks incoming, unless port forwarding.
Usually, that's not true. You may want to think about what's called "NAT
helpers".
Usually, it's not a problem to get through a NAT implementation. Skype,
for example, does this as default.
Yours,
VB.
--
"Die Funktionsprinzipien des Rechtsstaates sind den Funktionsprinzipien
des Präventionsstaates entgegengesetzt."
Erhard Denninger
Professor für Öffentliches Recht und Rechtsphilosophie, Uni Frankfurt
.
- References:
- How did they get past my NAT?
- From: Maniaque
- Re: How did they get past my NAT?
- From: Sebastian G.
- Re: How did they get past my NAT?
- From: Maniaque
- How did they get past my NAT?
- Prev by Date: Anything wrong with blocking "new" SYN/ACK packets?
- Next by Date: Re: Good mid size company router/gateway ideas? VPN solutions (Ssl)? Current choices ...
- Previous by thread: Re: How did they get past my NAT?
- Next by thread: Re: How did they get past my NAT?
- Index(es):