Re: Why block web hit counters?
- From: Leythos <void@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 06:52:18 -0400
In article <1189676395.585895.141950@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
chilly8@xxxxxxxxxxx says...
Corporate network admins really need to get a 'effin grip. Allowing
the hits to any web site to show up in StatCounter, for the webmasters
to examine, is NOT going to undermine the network. Corporate network
admins need to ligthen up a little.
Chilly, you really are a troll. People that run/own networks don't owe
you anything and don't need to allow anything other than what they WANT
TO ALLOW.
Personally, I block all third party items, and that really shows how
unethical some websites are, as their web pages show missing areas -
it's funny that people are starting to learn how ADs are setup on sites
and how third party info is found on sites.
The cool thing is that Admins are doing their jobs properly and securing
at least parts of their networks anyway.
I can't wait till they get the basics right and you find that corporate
networks no longer allow access to your crappy services through crappy
proxy servers - it's really simple to block them, and block you in the
process.
--
Leythos
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@xxxxxxxxxx (remove 999 for proper email address)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why block web hit counters?
- From: chilly8
- Re: Why block web hit counters?
- References:
- Why block web hit counters?
- From: chilly8
- Why block web hit counters?
- Prev by Date: SecureClient for OS-X and parallels NAT
- Next by Date: Re: Why block web hit counters?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why block web hit counters?
- Next by thread: Re: Why block web hit counters?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|