Re: Cisco ASA5505 VPN Tunnel Using Nat
- From: Newbie72 <sjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:47:59 -0700
On Aug 17, 9:34 am, Newbie72 <sjohn...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I have been asked to setup a site-site VPN tunnel using IPSEC.
Building the tunnel is not a issue for me. However, the folks at the
remote site are requiring that we provide a public ip address for our
local host. which they will be connecting to. I have searched the
cisco.com site and have not found a easy explained solution. The
remote site wants a configuration simular to below
Remote Site VPN End Point: 1.1.1.1
Host Ip Address at remote site 2.2.2.1 and 2.2.2.2
Our site
VPN End Point: 3.3.3.3
Local Host which will be tunneling traffic: They are requiring this to
be a public ip. Currently we use RFC-1918 addresses which means we
will have to translate a public address to our private host addresses.
Can I simply setup a static NAT statement which translates the public
address to our private addresss as we are only using one host on our
side?Then do I set "match address" to the public IP?
Thanks,
Steve J
Anbody got any suggestions?
.
- References:
- Cisco ASA5505 VPN Tunnel Using Nat
- From: Newbie72
- Cisco ASA5505 VPN Tunnel Using Nat
- Prev by Date: Re: Netgear FVS124G Blocking Ports
- Next by Date: Re: HOT WORKING PROXY
- Previous by thread: Cisco ASA5505 VPN Tunnel Using Nat
- Next by thread: Perimeter Firewall/UTM Suggestions?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|