Re: Vista FW outbound check
- From: "Kayman" <kayhkay~nospam~@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:16:06 +0700
"Mr. Arnold" <MR. Arnold@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:%oUmi.7730$rR.416@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
What are you, some kind of a Nazi control freak? Ooooh, I'm so afraid! I can't help if you deem my post to the OP as negative because you don't happen to agree. You call it rambling, I call a good factual response [Period].
It's just a suggestion. You might want to keep the negative in check and on a low heat,
I don't care about you, your imperious views and SG; Are you on medication? I am talking about a 3rd party firewall and you're jabbering about a 3rd person. You are turning this thread into a psychedilic rainbow of confusion. Why don't you just put a sock over your typing fingers.
thus you will be viewed in that same bad light as Sebastian G. is with his ramblings to the point that he is being ignored by many, as not credible.
Huh, *we*?
In other words, we have already been there, done that, seen that, and read that.
But you haven't got the T-Shirt, have you...and *we* all know why.
Hint: just measure the circumference of your head.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Vista FW outbound check
- From: Mr. Arnold
- Re: Vista FW outbound check
- References:
- Vista FW outbound check
- From: news.tim.it
- Re: Vista FW outbound check
- From: Kayman
- Re: Vista FW outbound check
- From: Mr. Arnold
- Re: Vista FW outbound check
- From: Kayman
- Re: Vista FW outbound check
- From: Mr. Arnold
- Re: Vista FW outbound check
- From: Kayman
- Re: Vista FW outbound check
- From: Mr. Arnold
- Vista FW outbound check
- Prev by Date: Re: KPF 2.1.5: Catch-all rule complicates having firewall ask about incoming ssh
- Next by Date: Re: Usenet allowed from work?
- Previous by thread: Re: Vista FW outbound check
- Next by thread: Re: Vista FW outbound check
- Index(es):