Re: Usenet allowed from work?
- From: Leythos <void@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:53:13 -0400
In article <f7gsj2$ud8$1@xxxxxxxx>, chilly8@xxxxxxxxxxx says...
The address is whichever of this company's "elite"
proxies you went to would show in the logs, yes.
But where you went beyond tht proxies would
only be known to the company providing this
service. The only thing that you, as a network
admin, would know is that someone was making
an encrypted connect to some strange address
in either Canada, the U.S., or the U.K, where
their elite proxies are hosted for the fastest
possible speeds..
And since that has no valid business reason, it's going to be blocked
and then the person doing it will be reprimanded. So, as you can see,
even if you fail to understand, it's easy to spot, easy to block, easy
to get the person doing it, etc...
The only reason you get connections is because the businesses don't lock
down their networks properly.
--
Leythos
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@xxxxxxxxxx (remove 999 for proper email address)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Usenet allowed from work?
- From: Chilly8
- Re: Usenet allowed from work?
- References:
- Re: Usenet allowed from work?
- From: Annikin Solo
- Re: Usenet allowed from work?
- From: Chilly8
- Re: Usenet allowed from work?
- From: Leythos
- Re: Usenet allowed from work?
- From: Chilly8
- Re: Usenet allowed from work?
- From: Eirik Seim
- Re: Usenet allowed from work?
- From: Chilly8
- Re: Usenet allowed from work?
- From: Leythos
- Re: Usenet allowed from work?
- From: Chilly8
- Re: Usenet allowed from work?
- Prev by Date: Re: Usenet allowed from work?
- Next by Date: Re: Vista FW outbound check
- Previous by thread: Re: Usenet allowed from work?
- Next by thread: Re: Usenet allowed from work?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|