Re: Port function and scanning
- From: "Sebastian G." <seppi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:12:47 +0200
Volker Birk wrote:
I fear, you just don't understand.
Same for you. So once again: If an RFC-conformant TCP/IP stack receives an
UDP packet, it is supposed to reply with an ICMP Destination Unreachable
with subcode Port Unreachable. Your quote is absolutely unrelated to this
point, maybe you should rather cite RFC 768?
.
- References:
- Port function and scanning
- From: NoSpam
- Re: Port function and scanning
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Port function and scanning
- From: NoSpam
- Re: Port function and scanning
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Port function and scanning
- From: NoSpam
- Re: Port function and scanning
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Port function and scanning
- From: Sebastian G.
- Re: Port function and scanning
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Port function and scanning
- From: Sebastian G.
- Re: Port function and scanning
- From: Volker Birk
- Port function and scanning
- Prev by Date: Re: Port function and scanning
- Next by Date: Re: Port function and scanning
- Previous by thread: Re: Port function and scanning
- Next by thread: Re: Port function and scanning
- Index(es):