Re: How to block upd port 137 traffic
- From: "Andy prelignat" <prelan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 20:03:49 +0200
"Jens Hoffmann" <jh@xxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:5bau3sF2s89rfU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,That's what I gathered from various sites while googleing. But you seem to disagree. As a relative greenhorn I would welcome more details.
Andy prelignat <prelan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Udp traffic is not as critical as tcp traffic.
Interesting thesis.
> So there is the system listening on a port. Why do you think,Nevertheless, I seem
not to be able to block some outgoing udp port 137 traffic
(netbios-ns) from my system. My PSF shows a listening state,
however no remote address (the executable is indicated as
"system").
listening is related to talking? e.g.: Why should there be any traffic
if there is just a process listening?
Because there are udp bytes sent. I wonder then where to?
Andy
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How to block upd port 137 traffic
- From: Jens Hoffmann
- Re: How to block upd port 137 traffic
- References:
- How to block upd port 137 traffic
- From: Andy prelignat
- Re: How to block upd port 137 traffic
- From: Jens Hoffmann
- How to block upd port 137 traffic
- Prev by Date: Re: SonicWall Global VPN Client Issue
- Next by Date: Re: Automate MAC & HOSTNAME changes in Linksys WRT54G NAT wireless router
- Previous by thread: Re: How to block upd port 137 traffic
- Next by thread: Re: How to block upd port 137 traffic
- Index(es):