Re: NAT Router
- From: Leythos <Void@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:34:04 -0500
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:28:23 +0000, Victek wrote:
Gerald,
Yes, I can see how it's possible for malware to be virtually undetectable.
In that case, what strategy do you recommend to protect against it?
You have to follow security normal when using a computer, on or off the
net, and you need to make sure that you have apps/os patches that are
designed to secure your system.
Once a machine is compromised, the only true to to be sure it's cleaned of
malware is to wipe it completely and reinstall from known clean media in a
clean environment.
--
Leythos
spam999free@xxxxxxxxxx (remove 999 for proper email address)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: NAT Router
- From: Victek
- Re: NAT Router
- References:
- NAT Router
- From: Tony
- Re: NAT Router
- From: Victek
- Re: NAT Router
- From: Gerald Vogt
- Re: NAT Router
- From: Victek
- Re: NAT Router
- From: Gerald Vogt
- Re: NAT Router
- From: Victek
- Re: NAT Router
- From: Gerald Vogt
- Re: NAT Router
- From: Victek
- NAT Router
- Prev by Date: Re: Sending a "ping": Which (ICMP) ports must be open in firewall to receive answer ?
- Next by Date: Re: Sending a "ping": Which (ICMP) ports must be open in firewall to receive answer ?
- Previous by thread: Re: NAT Router
- Next by thread: Re: NAT Router
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|