Re: Linksys WRT54G and Firewall software
- From: Leythos <Void@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:55:40 -0500
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:43:20 +0900, Gerald Vogt wrote:
The XP SP2 FW with no exceptions on a computer directly connected to the
internet is protecting the computer better than a NAT router. NAT does
not provide the protection like a properly setup packet filter.
You don't know what you are talking about. A typical SOHO NAT router, like
the Linksys BEFSR41, provides more protection for a single PC than Windows
XP firewall does.
For most users that have more than one computer, rather than using fixed
or dynamic public IP's for each computer/node, even a typical SOHO NAT
router provides more protection than Windows XP SP2 firewall.
Only a fool would believe that the Windows firewall provides more/better
protection for a single PC than a typeical NAT router.
--
Leythos
spam999free@xxxxxxxxxx (remove 999 for proper email address)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linksys WRT54G and Firewall software
- From: Gerald Vogt
- Re: Linksys WRT54G and Firewall software
- References:
- Linksys WRT54G and Firewall software
- From: R.User
- Re: Linksys WRT54G and Firewall software
- From: Leythos
- Re: Linksys WRT54G and Firewall software
- From: Gerald Vogt
- Re: Linksys WRT54G and Firewall software
- From: Leythos
- Re: Linksys WRT54G and Firewall software
- From: Gerald Vogt
- Linksys WRT54G and Firewall software
- Prev by Date: Re: Linksys WRT54G and Firewall software
- Next by Date: Re: Linksys WRT54G and Firewall software
- Previous by thread: Re: Linksys WRT54G and Firewall software
- Next by thread: Re: Linksys WRT54G and Firewall software
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|