Re: Win xp sp2 firewall
- From: "Mr. Arnold" <"Mr. Arnold"@Arnold.COM>
- Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 19:56:30 GMT
Volker Birk wrote:
Hexalon <Hexalon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Microsoft would have a lot less security problems if people would stop
running as admins. I really doubt if that is going to happen anytime
soon. People tend to be resistant to change unless change is forced on
them.
Beside that all "Leythos" said is nonsense (as usual from him), the best
way Microsoft could stop people to work as Administrator would be not to
have this as a default.
Well, it's not and there is no sense crying over it. The XP FW does have some issues in it that it will allow FW rules to be set for an application that the end-user has no clue about upon installation of the application. I have seen this with some .NET Windows applications that were using .NET remoting that I have developed and installed on XP with the FW active.
There is no way that the XP O/S or the XP FW knew the intent of that application good or bad as a client or server. And yet rules were set for the applications to punch through the FW. You name another PFW that allows this kind of rule setting, which is ridiculous.
Well, they're doing something like this now with Vista: the user is
administrator, but administrator's don't have every right any more :-/
(try to open a SYSTEM shell on Vista)
I guess they listened to someone after many years of not listening.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Win xp sp2 firewall
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Win xp sp2 firewall
- References:
- Win xp sp2 firewall
- From: Laura25
- Re: Win xp sp2 firewall
- From: Leythos
- Re: Win xp sp2 firewall
- From: Hexalon
- Re: Win xp sp2 firewall
- From: Volker Birk
- Win xp sp2 firewall
- Prev by Date: Re: Win xp sp2 firewall
- Next by Date: Re: 'attack' from Router IP..?
- Previous by thread: Re: Win xp sp2 firewall
- Next by thread: Re: Win xp sp2 firewall
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|