Re: OT: Re: Netstat
- From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers <usenet-2007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Jan 2007 21:39:55 GMT
Sebastian Gottschalk <seppi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers wrote:
Most definitely. However, to do that you need to identify the
offending software first. "netstat -anob" will help with that on
Windows XP. On versions prior to that I'd suggest using TCPView [1]
instead (run as admin user to get information about the processes).
TCPView works fine as a restricted user. Especially since it doesn't
share netstat's LUA bug "Can not obtain ownership information".
Only that on versions PRIOR TO XP (like e.g. Windows 2000) it DOES NOT
show information about the associated processes when run by restricted
users. Go figure.
cu
59cobalt
--
"If a software developer ever believes a rootkit is a necessary part of
their architecture they should go back and re-architect their solution."
--Mark Russinovich
.
- References:
- Re: Netstat
- From: Bit Twister
- Re: Netstat
- From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers
- Re: Netstat
- Prev by Date: Re: List of SOHO firewall routers that can do whitelisting
- Next by Date: ws_FTP asking to act as a server
- Previous by thread: Re: Netstat
- Next by thread: Re: Netstat
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
