Re: outbound filtering

Sebastian Gottschalk <seppi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:4vfsulF1c5ci9U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:

<snip mindless babble>



Ah, I understand: William = idiot

Now please, go away. You don't have any technical knowledge at all,
and unless you're willing to learn, you'll just keep on spouting
nonsense. I won't mind you, but please stop telling such nonsense to
other people who don't know any better.

Wow. I have watched this thread for a while now. Impressive, really. One
person can be so sure in himself, and so "secure" in his belief that HIS
system is the most secure, and his advice should be followed. Yet, while
going through the posts, I have yet to see any suggestions, or even helpful
advice from ANY of your posts. At least the OP is asking for advice. He/
she is doing so to aid in a proper decision. OP is showing critical
thinking. I must say, just that alone is far more than you are showing us.
I normally would steer clear of this, but I must admit, you do sound an
awful lot like the poster "Mr. Arnold" who has since seen the ugly side of
my killfile- a place where you will permanently reside.
Where I work, we have an entire sub department like this. We refer to them
as the "Trolls" or "Furry-teeths". We keep them locked in the server
dungeon while we deal with the real work, and only let them out at night to
check cables, and eat dust bunnies. They like to think that they are
important being in the dungeon, and are there as the "Tier 3" support and
security specialists because they are omnipotent, but the real reason we
put them there is because the sight of them causes fear in small children
and their body odour is enough to gag a maggot in a meat wagon. A bunch of
people who have too much education and book smarts, coupled with a
crippling case of small penis syndrome. They like to think they are the
most secure department, but really... its because we cut their cables.
I have no doubt in my mind that you possess a great deal of knowledge when
it comes to security. However, I have to ask- can you apply it to the real
world? And can you do what any person in the position of possessing such
knowledge should (and most would) do? Help others? I have my doubts.

kerrrrr-PLONK!

--

Whats easier for kissing random strangers? Misletoe or chloroform?
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Internet Explorer has been hijacked by "About:Blank"
    ... You went to the wrong web page, didn't have your IE secure enough, dropped ... If you don't wish to follow all of the advice immediately, ... using Windows XP "prettifications". ... You should at least turn on the built in firewall. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6.browser)
  • Re: Internet Explorer has been hijacked by "About:Blank"
    ... It contains advice ... > Windows XP, I suggest you clean up your system first. ... You should at least turn on the built in firewall. ... That's one facet of a secure PC, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6.browser)
  • Introducing XP Prof. in Windows 2000 domain with currently NT clients only
    ... We have a small domain with say 10 NTworkstations in a very secure ... migration of the NT4 workstations to XP. ... admins admin rights on the XP. ... Any advice how to let XP use the ntconfig.pol that is already in use ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.migration)
  • Introducing XP Prof. in Windows 2000 domain with currently NT clients only
    ... We have a small domain with say 10 NTworkstations in a very secure ... migration of the NT4 workstations to XP. ... admins admin rights on the XP. ... Any advice how to let XP use the ntconfig.pol that is already in use ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)