Re: Most sophisticated free firewall?
- From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers <usenet-2006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 4 Dec 2006 13:41:59 GMT
Kayman <khkay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Leythos wrote:
"...it was very interesting to see a few things:
1) Windows firewall failed all test :) "
Which isn't very surprising, since the Windows-Firewall doesn't do
outbound filtering, and doesn't claim to do it. The tests are targeted
at firewalls that *claim* to be capable of outbound filtering.
Leythos' statement above is equivalent to "A-ha! Windows notepad fails
at detecting viruses!!1eleventeen". Duh.
Well, yes. The way I understand is that Windows firewall never
claimed to filter outbound applications.
Correct.
cu
59cobalt
--
"If a software developer ever believes a rootkit is a necessary part of
their architecture they should go back and re-architect their solution."
--Mark Russinovich
.
- References:
- Most sophisticated free firewall?
- From: Eric
- Re: Most sophisticated free firewall?
- From: Eric
- Re: Most sophisticated free firewall?
- From: good . freeware . chau
- Re: Most sophisticated free firewall?
- From: Kayman
- Re: Most sophisticated free firewall?
- From: Kayman
- Most sophisticated free firewall?
- Prev by Date: delay of reply on ping and high cpu usage
- Next by Date: Re: What is UTM?
- Previous by thread: Re: Most sophisticated free firewall?
- Next by thread: Re: Most sophisticated free firewall?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|