Re: ZoneAlarm
- From: "@lf" <alf@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 12:34:44 +0100
arja wrote:
"Postal Dude" <sp@xxxxxx> schreef in bericht news:e9pch.310$ja6.308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxOn Sun, 03 Dec 2006 00:45:23 +0100, arja wrote:In contrary to the good for nothing windows firewall Zonealarm offersWhat if the malware has added itself to ZA's "allowed" rules? Then it does
monitoring of the outgoing traffic so youZr notified when youZr infected.
not give an alert.
Do you have an example of that.
Technique called process infection. Malware pick a process in memory (software firewalls usually makes checksums for files) and add it's own code to the process which is on software firewall "trusted" list. Recently I tried to repair a machine where uTorren was sending mailes/spam (broadband account was locked). uTorrent client normally didn't have e-mail capacibility. Machine was zombie, flatten and rebuilded. Firewall was ZA and it didn't report anything.
Rootkit. How to stop something WinAPI (software firewalls use it) cannot see. Recently I noticed that rootkit infections (usually zombie machines) are not uncommon anymore. On a same machine after killing uTorrenr, Rootkit revealers didn't report anything. But after scanning machine remote (nmap) I noticed unusal ports opened (netstat and activeports didn't report anything there), so probably rootkit was running. ZA didn't report anything as well.
.
- References:
- ZoneAlarm
- From: Jim Ford
- Re: ZoneAlarm
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: ZoneAlarm
- From: arja
- Re: ZoneAlarm
- From: Postal Dude
- Re: ZoneAlarm
- From: arja
- ZoneAlarm
- Prev by Date: Re: ZoneAlarm
- Next by Date: Most sophisticated free firewall?
- Previous by thread: Re: ZoneAlarm
- Next by thread: Re: ZoneAlarm
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|