Re: Comodo Firewall
- From: Garrot <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 01:52:45 GMT
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 02:56:44 +0200, Sebastian Gottschalk wrote:
What's your problem with understanding that keeping up with patches and
otherwise acting carefully (e.g. knowing what you do) does not pose any
security problem, and that your additional shit hardly provides any new,
real or user-understandable measures?
Because I've been bitten by adware before and know you have to take
precautions against malware besides what you say. Unless, of course, you
are willing to run a web browser with all scripting turned off.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Comodo Firewall
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Comodo Firewall
- References:
- Re: Comodo Firewall
- From: Wolfgang Kueter
- Re: Comodo Firewall
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Comodo Firewall
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Comodo Firewall
- From: Garrot
- Re: Comodo Firewall
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Comodo Firewall
- From: Garrot
- Re: Comodo Firewall
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Comodo Firewall
- From: Garrot
- Re: Comodo Firewall
- From: Garrot
- Re: Comodo Firewall
- Prev by Date: Re: Comodo Firewall
- Next by Date: Help with a tough question. RE: Firewall rule inspection overhead.
- Previous by thread: Re: Comodo Firewall
- Next by thread: Re: Comodo Firewall
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|