Re: security question
- From: "Duane Arnold" <Yeah-Don't-bother-@that's-right.BET>
- Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2006 15:09:35 GMT
----- Original Message -----
From: "sinisa" <sinisac@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Newsgroups: comp.security.firewalls
Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: security question
If I want total separations of machines in a LAN situation, I would be
doing it with a two router solution.
You can get a second good router on sale for about $20.
Ok great so another router is the way to go
BTW i dont care about spending 20-200$ if that is the best solution .
I'll put it do you this way. A standalone device solution, in your case,
such as a second router if you want absolute protection from the other
machines on the LAN is the best solution.
..
What second router should i use ,what is best known for good firewall and
security performance?
The security is in the separation of the two networks, in your case, where
as, the machine you're trying to protect will not receive any unsolicited
inbound traffic not only from the Internet but from other machines on your
LAN. The second router is going to flat-out stop that from happening.
The second router is only going to allow inbound traffic back to the machine
that the machine has sent outbound traffic to it whether that be outbound
traffic is to a remote IP on the Internet or to another machine on the LAN.
You put that second router in play and the machine will not be able to talk
to other machines in a LAN situation connected to another router. Nor will
the other machine connected to the other router will be able to talk to the
machine that has been segregated.
The router you need to make sure that it has all the bells and whistles on
it you want is the gateway router that's connected to the modem and is the
Internet facing router. The router that's doing network segregation behind
the gateway router can be an el-cheap-o of anything you want. It doesn't
make a difference.
I saw a guy in another NG post that he got a Linksys for $10 at Best Buy.
Duane :)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: security question
- From: sinisa
- Re: security question
- References:
- security question
- From: sinisa
- Re: security question
- From: sil
- Re: security question
- From: Duane Arnold
- Re: security question
- From: sinisa
- security question
- Prev by Date: Re: security question
- Next by Date: Re: security question
- Previous by thread: Re: security question
- Next by thread: Re: security question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading