Re: Routing for a Virtual Server in Checkpoint
- From: Greg Hennessy <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 09:09:16 +0100
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 07:05:04 +0000 (UTC),
larstr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Will <westes-usc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
With newer versions of Checkpoint you can also use "client side
natting"
to avoid the need for such manual routing.
You still need it on some NGX platforms when working with manual nat rules
& VIPs on different subnets.
greg
--
Wühle täglich in der Scheisse,
und niemand weiss, wie ich heisse.
Es gibt nur einen, der mich kennt,
und mich bei meinem Namen nennt.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Routing for a Virtual Server in Checkpoint
- From: Jean-François Gobin
- Re: Routing for a Virtual Server in Checkpoint
- References:
- Routing for a Virtual Server in Checkpoint
- From: Will
- Re: Routing for a Virtual Server in Checkpoint
- From: larstr
- Routing for a Virtual Server in Checkpoint
- Prev by Date: Re: Routing for a Virtual Server in Checkpoint
- Next by Date: Re: Routing for a Virtual Server in Checkpoint
- Previous by thread: Re: Routing for a Virtual Server in Checkpoint
- Next by thread: Re: Routing for a Virtual Server in Checkpoint
- Index(es):