Re: best software firewall?

bassbag wrote:

Its a relevant comment in context to the posters reply...which basically
was that agnitum cant be trusted because it had security flaws in its
programming.Windows has security flaws too..hence the continued security
updates.

But you understand the difference between random and systematic errors?
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Security Updates -- Are they necessary in Linux for user?
    ... security updates are necessary for virtually every major operating system. ... Not all of those 213 updates are necessarilly for security flaws. ... Some may be for bugs that cause programs to behave incorrectly or crash, and a few may install upgraded versions of programs with new features. ... 11/06, Mac OS X 10.4.8, FreeBSD 6.2, and every single one of them has updates for one reason or another. ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: Configurating the Firewall in both Linux and Xp!
    ... > installs are secure out of the box, and both require updates, you need ... > something to protect you while doing the updates - a router for a home ... Windows has uncountable security holes. ... FreeBSD doesn't have any security flaws and hence it doesn't require ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: best software firewall?
    ... was that agnitum cant be trusted because it had security flaws in its ... programming.Windows has security flaws too..hence the continued security ... updates. ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
Quantcast