Re: not listening

From: Sebastian Gottschalk <seppi@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 19:34:04 +0200

Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers wrote:

Walter Roberson wrote:

Sebastian Gottschalk <seppi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Now would you please read RFC 793 and maybe also the POSIX standard
to clearly understand what "listening" means in terms of TCP/IP
communication?

If you recheck you will find that the original poster did not specify
TCP/IP.

Name another common network protocol with ports, wiseguy.

IPX, even though they're commonly calling it sessions. :-)
Now still it doesn't make any difference.
.

References:
- not listening
  - From: Frank
- Re: not listening
  - From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers
- Re: not listening
  - From: Walter Roberson
- Re: not listening
  - From: Sebastian Gottschalk
- Re: not listening
  - From: Walter Roberson
- Re: not listening
  - From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers

Prev by Date: Re: not listening
Next by Date: Re: not listening
Previous by thread: Re: not listening
Next by thread: Re: not listening
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: not listening
... to clearly understand what "listening" means in terms of TCP/IP ... If you recheck you will find that the original poster did not specify ...
(comp.security.firewalls)
Re: not listening
... to clearly understand what "listening" means in terms of TCP/IP ... If you recheck you will find that the original poster did not specify ... Name another common network protocol with ports, ...
(comp.security.firewalls)
Re: not listening
... to clearly understand what "listening" means in terms of TCP/IP ... If you recheck you will find that the original poster did not specify ... Name another common network protocol with ports, ...
(comp.security.firewalls)