Re: The Coalition against Personal Firewalls
- From: "fritsz" <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 12:25:57 +0200
"Volker Birk" <bumens@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
changedI thought we had to change something to prove that your claim that a
binary would not be detected is right.
If you want to do so, yes.
it's not my program. This "you have to do the compiling" has to come to an
end. I quit this discussion, afterall this a firewall newsgroup.
This PoC item is about security, but not firewall security :-).
But if your PoC signature claim is the correct solution? I doubt it.
Why?
hint : there is more code involved between your 1 kB source and the 27 kB
binary.
And yes; Avira could be to easy-going ( they were with the previous Antivir
version ).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Coalition against Personal Firewalls
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: The Coalition against Personal Firewalls
- References:
- Re: The Coalition against Personal Firewalls
- From: Somebody.
- Re: The Coalition against Personal Firewalls
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: The Coalition against Personal Firewalls
- From: fritsz
- Re: The Coalition against Personal Firewalls
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: The Coalition against Personal Firewalls
- From: fritsz
- Re: The Coalition against Personal Firewalls
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: The Coalition against Personal Firewalls
- From: fritsz
- Re: The Coalition against Personal Firewalls
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: The Coalition against Personal Firewalls
- Prev by Date: Re: How to block messenger in checkpoint firewall
- Next by Date: Re: The Coalition against Personal Firewalls
- Previous by thread: Re: The Coalition against Personal Firewalls
- Next by thread: Re: The Coalition against Personal Firewalls
- Index(es):