Re: Firewalls, mail, and port 56341
- From: Wolfgang Ewert <W.Ewert@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 22:08:29 +0200
Hallo Sebastian Gottschalk, Du teiltest mit:
Evan Platt wrote:
And where exactly? Before or after the typical TCP state check rule?
Not sure with Kerio. You just add it.
See? It's a useless piece of software. Hiding such important things
ain't no good.
The old Kerio 2.1.5 has had some paket filtering *AND* logging
capabilities. I used it within WinNT (4.0). It was possible to priorize
filtering rules, but the only DENY rule was "drop" and no "reject". At
the kerio web page, I found in the version history, that they added some
functionality to reject (and not to drop) incoming requests at the ident
port (113).
Wolfgang
.
- References:
- Re: Firewalls, mail, and port 56341
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
- Re: Firewalls, mail, and port 56341
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
- Re: Firewalls, mail, and port 56341
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
- Re: Firewalls, mail, and port 56341
- Prev by Date: Re: Personal Firewalls - A Complete Failure
- Next by Date: Unstalling linspot
- Previous by thread: Re: Firewalls, mail, and port 56341
- Next by thread: Personal Firewalls - A Complete Failure
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|