Re: Firewalls, mail, and port 56341
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk <seppi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 05:00:24 +0200
Evan Platt wrote:
Oh, and your logging function doesn't show you an inbound connection
attempt at IdentD/Auth (TCP/113)?
Nope.
As this is unexpected, did you utilize a packet sniffer to verify these
results? Can you install such one at or near the SMTP server?
Where's your firewall rule to either
allow or at least reject (with TCP-RST) such connections?
Well, I added a rule to allow all inbound and outbound connections on
the entire netblock the mail server is on.
And where exactly? Before or after the typical TCP state check rule?
Did I mention that if I switch to a mail server (running port 25) on
an entirely different network, it works fine, no delay?
Hm... could this be a ingress filter rule?
Eh... uninstallation Kerio? This piece of bitjunk will always break your
network.
Any recommendations for a good free firewall?
s/firewall/host-based packet filter/
casual: Windows Firewall is fine
advanced: Win-IPFW <http://wipfw.sf.net>
<humbly> I obviously don't know as much about TCP/IP as you oh great
one. As I mentioned, same results running the standard windows
firewall.
Windows firewall blocks local listen()s by default. Did you create an
exception rule?
.
- References:
- Re: Firewalls, mail, and port 56341
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
- Re: Firewalls, mail, and port 56341
- Prev by Date: Re: Firewalls, mail, and port 56341
- Next by Date: Re: pix6.3 logging
- Previous by thread: Re: Firewalls, mail, and port 56341
- Next by thread: Re: Firewalls, mail, and port 56341
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|