Re: Netscreen 5400 configuration problem
- From: markul@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 22 May 2006 04:03:46 -0700
One of the best features (in my opinion) of the NetScreen firewalls is
the ability to have multiple interfaces with the same, or overlapping
network ranges. This is possible by NetScreen supporting multiple
virtual routers (VRs)
For the firewall to support overlapping ranges you will need to
configure the two interfaces on a different VRs.
NetScreens don't support that configuration. Think about it, what would the
routing table look like?
The routing is not so much of an issue, but it is the NAT that will
need careful consideration!
Mike
--
I'm using google groups, so my messages might out of date.
Somebody. wrote:
"Vilar" <paulo.vilar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1148035389.458167.316670@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi all,
I'm trying to configure 2 ports of the 5400 firewall with the same
subnet but I dont know how.
I have the same subnet in diferent buildings so I have to connect the 2
buildings to 2 different ports...and aggregate is not the answer.
Can someone please help me ?
Thank you,
Paulo Vilar
NetScreens don't support that configuration. Think about it, what would the
routing table look like?
-Russ.
.
- References:
- Netscreen 5400 configuration problem
- From: Vilar
- Re: Netscreen 5400 configuration problem
- From: Somebody.
- Netscreen 5400 configuration problem
- Prev by Date: pix6.3 logging
- Next by Date: WAN port on Firewall router
- Previous by thread: Re: Netscreen 5400 configuration problem
- Next by thread: Firewall Cisco
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
