Re: ZA unable to install
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk <seppi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 03:07:18 +0200
John wrote:
In addition to a hardware/router firewall I have used ZA Pro for years and
has worked well.
means: you didn't do any auditing to detect those numerous defects that
actually make it a big security problem
Lets me know what parts of an application want unneeded
access to confidential files
Files? Lol.
or connectivity.
So, I'm doing the same with TcpView or other netstat derivates.
But how is that related to security? None of these solutions works
against malicious software.
Blocks from within with popups if you like.
Only works with software which allows to be controlled, and this is
obviously no threat. Beside that, there is no need to do so, as there's
really nearby no legitimate software which does not follow a correct
configuration regarding networking behaviour.
.
- References:
- ZA unable to install
- From: Jas
- Re: ZA unable to install
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
- Re: ZA unable to install
- From: Jas
- Re: ZA unable to install
- From: John
- ZA unable to install
- Prev by Date: Re: Fortigate 60 and PPPoE DSL
- Next by Date: Netscreen Configuration Documents needed
- Previous by thread: Re: ZA unable to install
- Next by thread: Re: ZA unable to install
- Index(es):