Re: Simple method to block outgoing traffic
- From: Duane Arnold <""Yep-Don't-Bother\"@You-got-it-right@.BET">
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:08:48 GMT
Sebastian Gottschalk wrote:
Duane Arnold > wrote:
Really, the bottom line is who cares. If the makers of Aport want to use
an install package so what? ;-)
If I can't install it under normal conditions, I will simply not use it.
There's nothing bad with installer, just with non-working installers.
Yes, please do define what are normal conditions. I want to know what that is about.
If you're running on a NT based O/S and there is any kind of installer involved at least the ones I have setup and used to install a piece of software I have written, which may also have to register DLL(s) and make other registry entries such as ODBC, etc etc, then it has to be done with Admin rights that I know about on the NT based O/S.
Exe(s) don't have to be registered.
Duane :)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Simple method to block outgoing traffic
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
- Re: Simple method to block outgoing traffic
- References:
- Simple method to block outgoing traffic
- From: stacey . michols
- Re: Simple method to block outgoing traffic
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Simple method to block outgoing traffic
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
- Re: Simple method to block outgoing traffic
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
- Re: Simple method to block outgoing traffic
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
- Re: Simple method to block outgoing traffic
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
- Re: Simple method to block outgoing traffic
- From: Duane Arnold
- Re: Simple method to block outgoing traffic
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
- Simple method to block outgoing traffic
- Prev by Date: Re: News Release - ON SHEEP, WOLVES, AND SHEEPDOGS
- Next by Date: Netscreen-5 for sale
- Previous by thread: Re: Simple method to block outgoing traffic
- Next by thread: Re: Simple method to block outgoing traffic
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|