Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk <seppi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 19:43:12 +0100
Somebody. wrote:
Encrypted data streams don't look like unencrypted data streams, and so can
be detected.
Wrong. About every JPEG content body or any other well compressed data
are indistinguishable from pseudorandom data, so are encrypted data.
When encrypted streams are allowed only to whitelist hosts, and you don't
whitelist proxies, they become obvious.
Would you allow access to <http://www.nytimes.com/>?
.
- References:
- Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- From: Somebody.
- Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- From: Somebody.
- Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- From: Somebody.
- Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- From: Somebody.
- Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
- Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- From: Somebody.
- Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
- Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
- Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- From: Somebody.
- Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- Prev by Date: Re: Kids bypassing firewall via web proxy sites
- Next by Date: Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- Previous by thread: Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- Next by thread: Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- Index(es):