Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- From: "Somebody." <somebody.@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 13:58:14 -0500
"Volker Birk" <bumens@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:440f0555@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jason <Jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Then in that case you should know why companies use things likeI'm guessing then that the only IT work you do is at home or onNice guess. And wrong.
friends
computers and no real work.
white/blacklists and filter access to the internet etc.
I know, why companies like filtering. I really don't understand, why
someone wants to have whitelist filtering. Then you don't need Internet
access for your staff at all.
If you whitelist by category, you can give rather broad access while still
keeping it to the purposes of business or at least business plus harmless
personal areas. Websense makes this possible and feasible. At the same
time you can block the categories found under the broad headings of
"potential liability", "potential security risk" and "potential resource
waste" for example.
-Russ.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- References:
- Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- From: Somebody.
- Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- From: Jason
- Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- From: Jason
- Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- Prev by Date: Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- Next by Date: Re: 3COM OFFICECONNECT ISSUE
- Previous by thread: Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- Next by thread: Re: Anti-spyware at the Gateway
- Index(es):