Re: Blocked incoming ICMP, getting outgoing ICMP [3] Destination Unreachable
- From: Volker Birk <bumens@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Feb 2006 08:48:08 +0100
Dom <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
How 'bout clearing up this distinction between real and imitation
traceroute.
The original is from Van Jacobson, 4.3BSD.
It sends UDP packets with a very small TTL and waits until the ICMP
TIME_EXCEEDED answer arrives from each gateway along the route to a
host.
Microsoft's traceroute. Do they both not accomplish the same thing? I
would argue that ICMP echo is the proper protocol for a traceroute
because a firewalled target host is most likely to reply to an echo
request.
I'd like to see that you're right. But ICMP echo filtering is a
widespread disease in the days of "Personal Firewalls" and "stealthing".
I would place hping above all other traceroute utilities. Hping
can perform traceroutes with many protocols and ports.
With hping, you can do completely other things than a traceroute, too.
It's a packet generator, not a traceroute utility.
Yours,
VB.
--
Wenn Du "Ich sehe die Mathematik als einzigen Bereich an, wo es klare
Beweise gibt." und "Ich fuehle mich in einem Anzug unwohl." als Aussagen
mit aequivalentem Meinungsinhalt betrachtest, hast Du mit Deinem Gleichnis
recht. (Michail Bachmann zu Thomas Wallutis in d.a.s.r)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: i want security solutions software companies in hyderabad
- Next by Date: Re: Most Popular Hardware Firewalls?
- Previous by thread: Re: Blocked incoming ICMP, getting outgoing ICMP [3] Destination Unreachable
- Next by thread: Re: Blocked incoming ICMP, getting outgoing ICMP [3] Destination Unreachable
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|