Re: Router help please
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk <seppi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 05:31:11 +0100
TechGrrl wrote:
- WEP encryption that is no longer considered particularly safe as it
can be hacked quite easily. Note: wireless encryption encrypts ONLY the
authentication. The data is still sent in cleartext and can be sniffed
using a packet sniffer.
The latter is wrong, but generally WEP is totally b0rken. One can even
proof that the protocol itself is unsafe so any secure cipher wouldn't
help either.
- SSID hiding - hiding your network name from regular area scans and
thus allowing only users who know your network name access. Easily
discovered with slightly more advanced software so not good as a single
means of protection, but can compliment other methods.
It basically creates frustation through problems and more log entries
due to people accidently stumbling into your network.
- MAC filtering - allowing only specific wireless adaptors access to
the network. This method is hackable but required quite a bit of
effort.
What effort? This is a 4 lines bash script involving tcpdump and iwconfig.
- WPA encryption - Similar to WEP but AFAIK harder to hack.
So far it's impossible to hack better than bruteforce.
I use Check Point Safe@Office 500W that gives very good protection with
built-in firewall, IPS, antivirus and of course comprehensive wireless
security.
Sound like the common bull***.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Router help please
- From: louise
- Re: Router help please
- References:
- Router help please
- From: louise
- Re: Router help please
- From: TechGrrl
- Router help please
- Prev by Date: Re: Router help please
- Next by Date: Pix 506E or Netscreen 5GT?
- Previous by thread: Re: Router help please
- Next by thread: Re: Router help please
- Index(es):