newbie - is this an appropriate use of bridging firewalls?
I am co-locating a production server in a data center. I want it to be
secure as possible while doing it myself.
The server will be *nix/Apache/PHP/MySQL (will separate the MySQL into a
separate box at some point later).
I am think about putting a bridging firewall between the server and the
internet.
Is that more secure than a regular firewall?
What about later when I add the database server in a separate box, would it
be appropriate to have that box behind a bridging firewall?
Thanks
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: write with cURL
... It takes time to set up an account for you, process the billing, etc. ... Sorry, my servers are secure. ... Nothing you have told me shows me you know how to lock down a server so that it is secure - other than to use the server's file security. ... (alt.php) - Re: NT4 -> Win2K3 question
... disable SMB signing for the Workstation or Server service on a domain ... Get Secure! ... The File Replication Service Event log test ... controller to the following destination domain ... (microsoft.public.windows.server.migration) - [OT] Re: RSA implementation, please comment.
... on a separate server is actually a very good idea, ... This web front uses a well defined and secure ... Don't store the private key on the server. ... Every client gets a smartcard for the decryption (or a HSM, ... (comp.lang.perl.misc) - Re: Word 2007 Missing User Level Securitty - ARRRGGGGHHHH What were they thinking?
... File servers aren't secure? ... Access predates Windows security, ... database system has never been updated or kept current. ... the OS-based database server product, ... (microsoft.public.access.security) - Re: local admin account password
... >> except its based on something specific about the server. ... >> more recovery console and don't think cached logins will work. ... >> The DB file would be encrypted with EFS so only the limited user SQL ... >> and the app itself doesn't really need to be secure as the ... (Focus-Microsoft) |
|