Re: Firewall for web hosting company
- From: Troubled User <big.smelly.litter.box@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:41:16 -0500
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:54:27 +0100, Claus Pedersen <SeeBelow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Everyone
We are a hosting company that are looking for a new firewall solution
because our current Symantec Enterprise Firewall can't handle the traffic.
Our current traffic is never over 10Mb/10Mb but there is a large number
of connections (http/https (smtp, dns)) which apparently is the problem
for our current firewall
Our demands is high availability and high performance (two firewalls in
HA mode).
Our supplier has sent us an offer for three different solution.
2x Checkpoint VPN-1 PRO on Crossbeam C10 in HA setup
2x Sonicwall 4100 in HA setup
2x Symantec Gateway Security 5640 in HA setup.
Sonicwall is in price terms the most attractive product but what about
performance and security.
It's difficult to compare them based on fact sheets, so I hope that I
can get some help from you.
Best regards
Claus Pedersen
csf clausp.dk
Based on my experience with a single Sonicwall Model: PRO 230 (CPU: StrongARM / 233 Mhz)
1. The gui is very limiting and awkward.. Although if your just running common web hosting services, you should be ok.
2. If something goes wrong and you need to call their support........ There tech support is located in India, Singapore or one of those
places where you just can't understand what there trying to say. More importantly they don't speak english. They just listen for key words,
and read answers off the screen.
ie:
Q: How much does a hamburger cost in your country, and can I pick it up with my VPN ?
A: Ok mr. sir. Click on VPN and then click on summary.
Obviously these aren't the actual questions i've asked, but you get the point.
3. Again with the support, their either using VoIP over ADSL for the whole office, or their using cell phones inside a tunnel.
All in all, If you need a basic setup which it sounds like your using: then you'll be fine.
Any type of obscure customization, and your screwed.
On the plus side! Logging is descent. It allows you to send all your logs to a syslog server.
Problem with that, no matter which options you choose to have it send to the syslog server, you get everything.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Firewall for web hosting company
- From: snertking
- Re: Firewall for web hosting company
- From: Claus Pedersen
- Re: Firewall for web hosting company
- References:
- Firewall for web hosting company
- From: Claus Pedersen
- Firewall for web hosting company
- Prev by Date: Re: wavy lines
- Next by Date: Re: wavy lines
- Previous by thread: Firewall for web hosting company
- Next by thread: Re: Firewall for web hosting company
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|